1 Not for release to US wire services or distribution in the United States 02 November 2021 ASX ANNOUNCEMENT Significant Copper Intersections from Nifty West Drilling HIGHLIGHTS ? First assay results received from the Nifty West drilling program targeting lightly tested areas of copper mineralisation below and to the immediate west of the former Nifty open pit. ? Multiple zones of significant copper mineralisation intersected in the keel of the Nifty Syncline below the open pit. Significant results include: Hole 21NRWP016 – Copper mineralisation extends over 92m downhole, including: o 8m at 1.45% Cu from 191m including: ? 3m at 3.14% Cu from 195m , and o 6m at 0.48% Cu from 201m including: ? 1m at 1.09% Cu from 202m , and o 3m at 0.53% Cu from 210m including: ? 1m at 1.03% Cu from 211m , and o 27m at 0.74% Cu from 214m including: ? 4m at 1.99% Cu from 218m, 1m at 1.02% Cu from 224m & 1m at 1.16% Cu from 238m , and o 7m at 0.58% Cu from 245m including: ? 1m at 2.02% Cu from 246m , and o 8m at 0.91% Cu from 255m 1 including: ? 2m at 1.79% Cu from 260m Hole 21NRWP015 – Copper mineralisation extends over 90m downhole, including: o 9m at 0.71% Cu from 172m including: ? 1m at 1.85% Cu from 179m , and o 20m at 0.68% Cu from 190m including: ? 6m at 1.09% Cu from 195m & 1m at 1.52% Cu from 206m , and o 11m at 0.81% Cu from 213m including: ? 2m at 1.20% Cu from 217m & 3m at 1.11% Cu from 221m , and o 3m at 0.55% Cu from 243m 1 1 Hole ended in mineralisation 2 Hole 21NRWP013 – Copper mineralisation extends over 68m downhole, including: o 8m at 0.61% Cu from 179m including: ? 1m at 1.83% Cu from 185m , and o 12m at 0.41% Cu from 195m , and o 14m at 0.65% Cu from 208m including : ? 1m at 1.58% Cu from 212m & 1m at 1.18% Cu from 219m , and o 5m at 0.97% Cu from 223m , and o 3m at 0.52% Cu from 244m including: ? 1m at 1.07% Cu from 245m Hole 21NRWP014 – Copper mineralisation extends over 72m downhole, including: o 7m at 0.50% Cu from 198m including: ? 1m at 1.21% Cu from 202m & 1m at 1.01% Cu from 204m , and o 8m at 0.49% Cu from 208m including: ? 1m at 1.00% Cu from 209m & 1m at 1.01% Cu from 212m , and o 8m at 0.69% Cu from 228m including: ? 1m at 1.58% Cu from 233m , and o 6m at 0.60% Cu from 240m including: ? 1m at 1.60% Cu from 244m ? Results highlight strong potential for additional open pit mineralisation to grow the existing +0.6 Mt copper Mineral Resource. 2 ? Follow-up drilling currently being planned. Managing Director Barry Cahill commented: “The first phase of drilling at Nifty West has clearly demonstrated excellent potential to expand the existing open pit resource up-plunge of the former underground mine within the keel area of the Nifty Syncline. Follow-up drilling is being planned as a priority. In the meantime, we look forward to reporting further assay results from the Nifty West drilling program once they are received and the first results from our Maroochydore drilling program which is now well advanced.” Cyprium Metals Limited (ASX: CYM) (“ Cyprium ” or the “ Company ”) is pleased to announce that first assay results from the Nifty West drilling program. The initial batch of results are from 16 RC holes (for 3,830m) drilled within the existing resource model targeting: • a lightly drill tested area of potential low-grade copper oxide and supergene mineralisation extending from the western end of the open pit. • a poorly drilled area up-plunge of the keel area of the Nifty Syncline below the western end of the Nifty open pit (Figure 1). 2 Refer to Cyprium’s ASX announcement dated 10 February 2021 “ Transformational Acquisition Highly Attractive Cu Portfolio ” and Metals X’s ASX announcements dated 10 March 2020 “ Nifty Copper Mine Resource Update” and 18 August 2016 “ Annual Update of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves .” 3 Figure 1 / Nifty Copper Project showing location of western drilling program (local grid) The hole locations from the current program are shown in Figure 2 with the significant intersections summarised in Table 2. Figure 2 / Nifty West drill hole collar locations (local grid) (Note: historic drill holes are within the existing Mineral Resource area and are displayed for information purposes only) Western Drill Program 4 Discussion of results Wide intervals of low to medium-grade copper sulphide mineralisation were encountered on the two sections lines (101,480E – Figure 3 and 101,520E– Figure 4) drilled below the western end of the open pit. This mineralisation is interpreted associated with the up-plunge extent of the Nifty Syncline keel zone, which has been lightly drilled tested from both surface and underground. The results from the western extensions of the former Nifty open pit were generally consistent with the low-grade results from the previous wide-spaced holes. Figure 3 / Nifty West drill hole section 101,480E 5 Figure 4 / Nifty West drill hole section 101,520E (Note: underground holes were drilled sub-parallel to the mineralisation and are displayed for information purposes only) Further drilling will be conducted to the immediate west of this keel zone as a priority, which has the potential to materially grow the existing +0.6 Mt copper resource inventory at Nifty (Figure 5). Figure 5 / Nifty West target area TARGET AREA 6 This ASX announcement was approved and authorised by the Board on Cyprium Metals Limited. For further information: Barry Cahill Wayne Apted Investor and Media Relations Managing Director Chief Financial Officer Lexi O'Halloran & Company Secretary email@example.com T +61 8 6374 1550 T +61 404 577 076 E firstname.lastname@example.org Follow the Company developments through our website and social media channels: Competent Person The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results and the estimation and reporting of the Nifty Mineral Resource Estimate is an accurate representation of the available data and is based on information compiled by external consultants and Mr. Peter van Luyt who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (2582). Mr. van Luyt is the Chief Geologist of Cyprium Metals Limited, in which he is also a shareholder. Mr. van Luyt has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person (CP). Mr. van Luyt consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Cyprium confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, which all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not materially changed from the original market announcement. Table 1: Nifty West drillhole collar table Local Grid MGA 94 Zone 50 Hole ID Type Depth East North R L m Dip ° Az ° East North R L m Az ° 21NRWP001 RC 239 101198.2 50563.4 10305.2 -55.0 0.7 351564.3 7604524.9 305.2 26.5 21NRWP002 RC 246 101198.3 50565.0 10305.1 -89.8 156.8 351565.1 7604526.3 305.1 182.5 21NRWP003 RC 257 101239.9 50544.5 10306.0 -89.8 195.1 351594.0 7604490.0 306.0 220.8 21NRWP004 RC 264 101277.5 50505.0 10305.3 -89.1 139.4 351611.2 7604438.3 305.3 165.2 21NRWP005 RC 217 101157.0 50649.2 10301.7 -89.2 152.2 351563.6 7604620.1 301.7 177.9 21NRWP006 RC 174 101159.7 50647.2 10301.8 -54.5 2.5 351565.2 7604617.1 301.8 28.3 21NRWP007 RC 198 101155.3 50643.5 10301.9 -54.3 336.3 351559.6 7604615.6 301.9 2.0 21NRWP008 RC 263 101280.0 50496.9 10305.5 -55.2 1.1 351610.0 7604429.9 305.5 26.8 21NRWP009 RC 255 101280.0 50510.0 10306.5 -70.6 0.1 351615.6 7604441.8 306.5 25.9 21NRWP010 RC 240 101241.8 50539.7 10305.0 -74.4 336.4 351593.6 7604485.0 305.0 2.2 21NRWP011 RC 240 101240.4 50538.1 10304.9 -56.6 359.9 351592.7 7604485.4 304.9 25.7 21NRWP012 RC 220 101238.7 50543.6 10305.0 -55.2 22.0 351592.5 7604489.8 305.0 47.8 21NRWP013 RC 250 101482.2 50483.4 10281.7 -55.4 358.7 351787.2 7604331.6 281.7 24.5 21NRWP014 RC 258 101482.2 50482.3 10281.7 -71.4 0.8 351786.8 7604330.7 281.7 26.6 21NRWP015 RC 246 101521.9 50479.5 10281.3 -55.9 357.4 351821.4 7604311.2 281.3 23.2 21NRWP016 RC 263 101522.0 50478.4 10281.3 -71.1 359.8 351821.1 7604310.2 281.3 25.6 Note: All holes surveyed by differential GPS and converted to local grid 7 Table 2: Nifty West drillhole intersections Hole ID F rom (m) T o (m) W idth (m) Cu (%) 21NRWP001 136 142 6 0.23 171 174 3 0.2 3 21NRWP002 219 223 4 0.18 21NRWP003 121 126 5 0.20 155 159 4 0.21 21NRWP004 160 165 5 0.19 193 197 4 0.15 199 202 3 0.12 207 213 6 0.13 226 230 4 0.16 235 238 3 0.15 245 248 3 0.20 21NRWP005 94 101 7 0.25 133 136 3 0.20 21NRWP006 79 86 7 0.28 94 109 15 0.19 114 119 5 0.33 21NRWP007 83 90 7 0.29 120 124 4 0.33 21NRWP008 180 183 3 0.27 203 206 3 0.20 220 223 3 0.13 225 230 5 0.14 252 255 3 0.24 21NRWP009 154 161 7 0.17 190 194 4 0.16 196 200 4 0.12 247 250 3 0.12 21NRWP010 135 140 5 0.18 21NRWP011 155 160 5 0.23 173 176 3 0.19 197 200 3 0.21 21NRWP01 2 160 166 6 0.24 178 182 4 0.33 185 188 3 0.12 195 199 4 0.26 201 207 6 0.17 21NRWP013 179 187 8 0.61 including 185 186 1 1.83 195 207 12 0.41 208 222 14 0.65 including 212 213 1 1.58 including 219 220 1 1.18 8 Hole ID F rom (m) T o (m) W idth (m) Cu (%) 223 228 5 0.97 231 234 3 0.39 236 239 3 0.29 244 247 3 0.52 including 245 246 1 1.07 21NRWP014 174 181 7 0.24 198 205 7 0.50 including 202 203 1 1.21 including 204 205 1 1.01 208 216 8 0.49 including 209 210 1 1.00 including 212 213 1 1.01 217 223 6 0.34 228 236 8 0.69 including 233 234 1 1.58 240 246 6 0.60 including 244 245 1 1.60 21NRWP015 156 164 8 0.48 172 181 9 0.71 including 179 180 1 1.85 190 210 20 0.68 including 195 201 6 1.09 including 206 207 1 1.52 213 224 11 0.81 including 217 219 2 1.20 including 221 224 3 1.11 226 230 4 0.47 232 240 8 0.37 243 246* 3 0.55 21NRWP016 171 178 7 0.32 191 199 8 1.45 including 195 198 3 3.14 201 207 6 0.48 including 202 203 1 1.09 210 213 3 0.53 including 211 212 1 1.03 214 241 27 0.74 including 218 222 4 1.99 including 224 225 1 1.02 including 238 239 1 1.16 245 252 7 0.58 including 246 247 1 2.02 255 263 * 8 0.91 including 260 262 2 1.79 9 Note: Minimum interval 1m if Cu > 1.0%, 3m if Cu < 1.0%. Minimum interval grade 0.1% Cu. No internal waste - break interval if result < 0.1% Cu. NSR denotes no significant results * Denotes end of hole About Cyprium Metals Limited Cyprium Metals Limited (ASX: CYM) is an ASX listed company with copper projects in Australia. The Company has a highly credentialed management team that is experienced in successfully developing sulphide heap leach copper projects in challenging locations. The Company’s strategy is to acquire, develop and operate mineral resource projects in Australia which are optimised by innovative processing solutions to produce copper metal on-site to maximise value. The Company has projects in the Murchison and Paterson regions of Western Australia, that is host to a number of base metals deposits with copper and gold mineralisation. Paterson Copper Projects This portfolio of copper projects comprises the Nifty Copper Mine, Maroochydore Copper Project and Paterson Exploration Project. The Nifty Copper Mine (“Nifty”) is located on the western edge of the Great Sandy Desert in the north-eastern Pilbara region of Western Australia, approximately 350km southeast of Port Hedland. Nifty contains a 2012 JORC Mineral Resources of 658,500 tonnes of contained copper. Cyprium is focussed on a heap leach SX-EW operation to retreat the current heap leach pads as well as open pit oxide and transitional material. Studies will investigate the potential restart of the copper concentrator to treat open pit sulphide material. The Maroochydore deposit is located ~85km southeast of Nifty and includes a shallow 2012 JORC Mineral Resources of 486,000 tonnes of contained copper. An exploration earn-in joint venture has been entered into with IGO on ~2,400km 2 of the Paterson Exploration Project. Under the agreement, IGO is to sole fund A$32 million of exploration activities over 6.5 years to earn a 70% interest in the Paterson Exploration Project, including a minimum expenditure of A$11 million over the first 3.5 years. Upon earning a 70% interest, the Joint Venture will form and IGO will free-carry Paterson Copper to the completion of a Pre-feasibility Study (PFS) on a new mineral discovery. Murchison Copper-Gold Projects Cyprium has an 80% attributable interest in a joint venture with Musgrave Minerals Limited (ASX: MGV) at the Cue Copper- Gold Project, which is located ~20km to the east of Cue in Western Australia. Cyprium will free-carry the Cue Copper Project to the completion of a definitive feasibility Study (DFS). The Cue Copper-Gold Project includes the Hollandaire Copper-Gold 2012 JORC compliant Mineral Resources of 51,500 tonnes contained copper, which is open at depth. Metallurgical test-work has been undertaken to determine the optimal copper extraction methodology, which resulted in rapid leaching times (refer to 9 March 2020 CYM announcement, “ Copper Metal Plated ”, https://cypriummetals.com/copper-metal-plated/). The Nanadie Well Project is located ~650km north east of Perth and ~75km south east of Meekatharra in the Murchison District of Western Australia, within mining lease M51/887. The Cue and Nanadie Well Copper-Gold projects are included in an ongoing scoping study, to determine the parameters required to develop a copper project in the region, which provides direction for resource expansion work. 10 Cyprium Metals project locations 11 JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report Nifty Copper Deposit Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. The deposit has been drilled and sampled using various techniques with diamond and reverse circulation drilling utilised for mineral estimation. This information comes from surface and underground and is on variable spacing along and across strike. The total metres within the immediate vicinity of the Deposit are 283,227m. The holes are drilled on most occasions to intersect as near as possible perpendicularly the synclinal east plunge mineralisation. Include refere nce to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. The drilling programs have been ongoing s ince initial discovery to both expand the mineralisation and provide control for mining. The hole collars were surveyed by employees/contractors of the various owners with the orientation recorded. Down hole survey was recorded using appropriate equipment. The diamond core was logged for lithology and other geological features. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems . Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. The diamond core varied from HQ to NQ in diameter and mineralised intervals and adjacent locations were sampled by cutting the core in half based on contacts of lithology and other geological features. The RC samples were collected from the cyclone of the rig and spilt at site to approximate 2 to 3Kg weight. The preparation and analysis was undertaken at accredited commercial laboratories, ALS or Intertek Genalysis. Both laboratories have attained ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. ALS used the ME-ICP61 four acid digest method using a sample of 0.2g with an ICPAES finish. Over limit results (>1% Cu) were re-analysed using the ME-OG62 method, which involves subjecting a 0.4g sample to a four acid digest with an ICPAES finish. Intertek Genalysis used a four acid digest using a 0.2g sample with an ICP-OES finish. Over limit results (>1% Cu) were re-assayed using an ore grade four acid digestion of 0.2g sample, and an AAS finish. The analysis and preparation of recent diamond drilling by Metals X was undertaken at the onsite Nifty laboratory which was contracted to accredited analytical testing service ALS. On- site, ALS used a Fusion XRF15C method for analysis. Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. The drilling was completed using a combination of surface and underground drilling. In general, the orientation of the drilling was appr opriate given the given the strike and dip of the mineralisation. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. 12 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. The core recovery was recorded in the database and in most instances was in excess of 95% within the fresh/sulphide zones. This was assessed by measuring core length against core run. There is no record of the quantity (weight) of RC chips collected per sample length. The ground conditions in the mineralised zone are competent. In areas of less competent material core return is maximised by controlling drill speed. In the case of RC samples a reas of less competent material were identified in the log. Whilst no assessment has been reported, the competency of the material sampled would tend to preclude any potential issue of sampling bias. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. The routine logging of core and chips describes the general geology features including stratigraphy, lithology, mineralisation, alteration etc. For the majority of holes this information is sufficient and appropriate to apply mineralisation constraints. Some core drilling is orientated and structural measurements of bedding, joints, veins etc. ha s occurred as well as fracture densities. Geological logging has recorded summary and detailed stratigraphy, lithology, mineralisation content, and alteration, some angle to core axis information, vein type, incidence and frequency, magnetic content. The entire length of all holes, apart from surface casing, was logged. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. All core to be sampled was half cored using a mechanical saw. It is not known if the core was consistently taken from the same side of the stick. RC chip samples were collected via a cyclone which was cleaned with air blast between samples. The samples riffled to collect between 2 and 3kg. Most samples are dry with any moisture noted on the logs. Field sub-sampling for chip samples appears appropriate as was the use of core cutting equipment for the submitted core. Procedures adopted in the laboratories are industry standard practises including that in the mine site facility. In field riffles are cleaned between sampling using compressed a ir. The diamond cutting equipment was cleaned during the process using water. All laboratories adopt appropriate industry best practises to reduce sample size homogeneously to the required particle size. No field duplicate information was observed. The style of mineralisation and high sulphide content does not rely on grain size as being influential on grade. Thus, there is confidence in the overall grade of the deposit being fairly represented by the sampling. If non-core, whether riffle d, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in- situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. 13 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. The assay techniques are appropriate for the determination of the level of mineralisation in the sample. No geophysical tools were utilised to ascertain grade. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable lev els of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. Standard and Blanks were included with all samples sent for analysis in the rate of between 1 in 20 and 1 in 50. The most recent reporting covering the majority of holes used in the e stimate provide support for the quality of the Cu assays. Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The extensive data set was reviewed by various parties including Maxwell Geoscience and DataGeo and the intersections within the mineralisation were confirmed. No twinned holes observed but there was a significant amount of closely spaced supportive drilling results. Field data was captured electronically, validated by the responsible geologist and stored on corporate computer facilities. Protocols for drilling, sampling and QAQC are contained with company operating manuals. The information generated by the site geologists was loaded into a database by the company database administrator and underwent further validation at this point against standard acceptable codes for all variables. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. The collar positions were resurveyed by the Company surveyor or their contractors from a known datum. The survey was on a known local grid with demonstrated control. The orien tation and dip at the collars was checked (aligned) by the geologist and down hole recording of azimuth and dip are taken at 30m intervals on most occasions using appropriate equipment. Accuracy tests in downhole surveys have been conducted on recent drill ing and show negligible variation against ‘Gyro’ survey by independent third party. The regional grid is GDA94 Zone 50 and the drilling was laid out on a local grid. Topographic control is from surface survey - note the deposit modelled is totally undergro und and is not influenced by surface topography. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. The majority of drilling utilised was on 40m x 20m grid pattern drilled from surface specifically targeting lithological and hence mineralisation sequence 14 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. definition, while current underground drill spacing was 20m to 25m on average. The geological sequence is well under stood from the mining which supports the current drill spacing as adequate for both grade continuity assessment and lithological modelling The sampling reflects the geological conditions. For Mineral Resource estimation a 2m composite length was chosen to reduce composite copper grade variability and facilitate variogram modelling, why still maintaining reasonable resolution for estimation. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Given the shape of the sequence, the drilling as best as practically possible, was orientated to intersect the sequence perpendicularly. No sampling bias was consider ed to have been introduced. Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. The samples once collected and numbered are stored in the site core yard. Each sample bag was securely tied with the pre- printed sample number on the bag and transported to either the onsite laboratory or by commercial contractors to Perth. Upon receipt at the laboratory the samples were checked against the dispatch sheets to ensure all samples were present. Audits or reviews The results of any audits or revie ws of sampling techniques and data. Resources and reserves were routinely reviewed by the previous owner’s Corporate technical team. Database management companies have over the past 3 years audited the drill hole database and found it representative of the information contained. 15 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The Nifty deposit is situated on Mining Lease M271/SA, which is 100% held by Nifty Copper Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cyprium Metals Ltd. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a lice nce to operate in the area. Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. WMC Resources Ltd discovered Nifty in 1980 by using regional ironstone sampling and reconnaissance geology. Malachite staining of an outcrop and Cu- anomalous ironstones from dune swale reconnaissance sampling were the initial indicators. This was followed up by lag sampling on a 500 x 50m grid that detected a 2.5 x 1.5km Cu- Pb anomaly. Secondary Cu mineralisation was intersected in percussion drilling in mid-1981, with high grade primary ore (20.8m at 3.8% Cu) discovered in 1983. WMC commenced open pit mining of the secondary oxide ore in 1992 and continued mining until September 1998 when Nifty was sold to Straits Resources. The Nifty project was purchased by Aditya Birla Minerals Ltd from Straits Resources in 2003. Nifty open pit mining ceased in June 2006. Copper extraction using heap leaching ceased at Nifty in January 2009. Nifty underground mining of the primary (chalcopyrite) mineralisation started in 2009. The Nifty project was purchased from Aditya Birla in 2016 by Metals X Ltd. Cyprium Metals subsequently purchased the Patterson Copper Project, including the Nifty Copper Mine and infrastructure on 31 March 2021. Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. The Nifty deposit is hosted within the folded Neoproterozoic Broadhurst Formation which is part of the Yeneena Group. The Broadhurst Formation is between 1000 m to 2000 m thick and consi sts of a stacked series of carbonaceous shales, turbiditic sandstones, dolomite and limestone. The Broadhurst Formation hosts all known significant base metal occurrences including the Nifty copper mine and the Maroochydore, Rainbow and Warrabarty prospects. Structurally, the dominant feature is the Nifty Syncline which strikes approximately southeast- northwest and plunges at about 6- 12 degrees to the southeast. The stratabound copper mineralisation occurs as a structurally controlled, chalcopyrite-quartz- dolomite replacement of carbonaceous and dolomitic shale within the folded sequence. The bulk of the primary 16 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary mineralisation is largely hosted within the keel and northern limb of the Syncline. Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar dip and azimuth of the hole down hole length and interception depth hole length. Refer to Tables 1 and 2 in the body of this announcement. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. No information is excluded. Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. No weighting, averaging or cut-off calculations apply to this announcement. All assay intervals reported in Table 2 are comprised of 1m downhole intervals. Intercept selection is detailed in the notes accompanying the t able in the body of the announcement. No metal equivalent calculations were applied. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. The significant intersections reported in this announcement are from holes drilled to intersect the stratigraphy of the Nifty Syncline at a perpendicular angle. The downhole lengths approximate the true widths of the copper mineralisation. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of dril l hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Included in the body of the report. 17 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Included in the body of the report. Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. A summary of previous material geological work relating to the Nifty mineralisation is reported in the JORC 2012 Table 1 Report section of this announcement. Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). The Nifty resource currently remains open to the east and south and is currently being drill tested by the company. Phase 2 drilling will be designed as phase 1 results are received. Operational feasibility studies have commenced and will form inform future announcements to the market as they are finalised. Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.