25 Nov

56g/t Au & 384g/t Ag at Gold Links

ASX Release 2 5 Nov ember 2021 DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED (ACN 149 105 653) ASX Code: DTR CAPITAL STRUCTURE Share Price ( 2 4 / 11/ 21) $0.0 8 2 Shares on issue 438 million Market Cap $ 3 5.9 million MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS Southern Cross Exploration NL 2 1 . 8 % Mr. Mark Johnson AO 19. 8 % National Nominees Ltd 1 1 . 9 % Stephen Baghdadi 5 . 9 % DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT Mark Johnson AO Chairman Stephen Baghdadi Managing Director Greg Hall Non - Executive Director Tony Ferguson Non - Executive Director Bill Lannen Non - Executive Director Mark Ohlsson Company Secretary CONTACT Mark Ohlsson Phone: +61 2 9375 2353 Postal Address: P.O. Box 553 South Hurstville NSW 2221 Email: info@datelineresources.com.au 56g/t gold and 384g/t silver i ntersect ed at Gold Links Highlights • High - grade gold intersection s up to 56.74g/t gold and 384g/t s ilver intersected at Gold Links as part of the underground drilling program • Significant intersections include: o CRG21 - 027: 1.6m @ 29.2g/t Au & 197g/t Ag inc. 0.6m @ 56.74g/t Au and 384g/t Ag o CRG21 - 025: 1.2m @ 13.92g/t Au & 27g/t Ag and 1.4m @ 5.53g/t Au & 9g/t Ag o CRG21 - 026: 0.8m @ 15.74g/t Au & 106g/t Ag • Results are in line with grade and width expectations for the 2150 vein Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) ( Dateline or the Company ) is pleased to announce high - grade gold intersection s returned from its 4,000 - metre underground drill ing program at the G old Links Gold Project, located in Gunnison County, Colorado : Commenting on the results , Dateline’s Managing Director, Stephen Baghdadi, said: “ The Gold Links project is a high - grade multi - vein gold system. These results are in line with our expectations and support the case that significant high - grade mineralisation continues below the old workings ” . To date, the best assay results have been achie ved when we have drilled into the sediments and below the old workings , t his will remain the case as we head north in the decline . Intersection Details The current phase of the underground drilling program is aimed at extending a known mineralised zone which was drilled between 1975 and 1985. The Company has so far completed eight out of a planned 10 holes from this drill station . R esults for three of the holes have been returned and five remain outstanding Figure 1 - Schematic showing new drill holes into the 2150 vein in green. Scale is in feet ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 CRG21 - 025 contained two intersections approx imately 7 metres apart and graded 13.92g/t Au and 27g/t Ag over 1.2 metres in the first section and 1.4 metres at 5.53g/t Au and 9g/t Ag in the second section. This hole was designed to test further into the hangingwall and in between intercepts from CRG21 - 00 4 and CRG21 - 00 6 , which assayed 9.7g/t Au and 17.95g/t Au respectively as disclosed in the September 2021 Quarterly report. CRG21 - 027 returned an assay result of 1.6 metres at 29.2g/t Au and 197g/t Ag. This hole was designed to confirm three historical high - grade intercept s . CRG21 - 026 returned an assay result of 0.8m at @15.74g/t Au and 106g/t Ag. This hole was designed to target approximately 50 feet (15.2 met re s) south of CRG21 - 027 and test the strike to the south of the known mineralised envelope . Further details on the drilling and assay methodology can be found in Table 1 at the end of this report. Underground Development Progress As noted above, the drilling program requires the development of 1,000m of underground development . The development will be used as a haulag e route and for underground exploration . To date, 700 metres of development has been completed, or approximately 70 % of the planned program. Following the initial preparation works required to commence development, the weekly development rate is progressin g in line with forecast. The Company anticipates completion of the current underground development program before the end of 2021. Importantly, the development is approximately 80 metres away from completion of a second escapeway, expected to be completed in mid - December. The completion of the second escapeway is an important milestone for the Company as it allows for alternative access when the Company commits to mining and stoping activities as part of the planned transition to production. Figure 2 – Long section view of ore zones annotated - Gold Links Project scale is in feet ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 Production Strategy The current program of underground development and drilling has been designed to support the Company’s plans to commence commercial production from Gold Li nks in the near term. The information being gathered, and the infrastructure being established will allow the Company to transition from developer to producer with minimal additional capital expenditure. The Company anticipates the decision to commit to pr oduction will be made before the end of 2021. Figure 2 : Schematic view of underground development progress This announcement has been authorised for release on ASX by the Company's B oard of D irectors. For more information, please contact: Stephen Baghdadi Managing Director +61 2 9375 2353 www.datelineresources.com.au Follow Dateline on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Dateline_DTR ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 About Dateline Resources Limited Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is an Australian publicly listed company focused on gold mining and exploration in North America. The Company owns 100% of the Gold Links and Green Mountain Projects in Colorado, USA and has an agreement to acquire 100 % of the Colosseum Gold Mine in California. The Gold Links Gold Mine is a historic high - grade gold mining project where over 150,000 ounces of gold was mined from high - grade veins. Mineralisation can be traced on surface and underground for almost 6km from the Northern to the Southern sections of the project. The Company aims to delineate sufficient Mineral Resources to commence a small high - grade, low - cost operation by the end of 2021. The Company owns the Lucky Strike gold mill, located 50km from the Gold Links mine, within the Green Mountain Project. It is proposed that ore from Gold Links would be transported to Lucky Strike for processing. The Colosseum Gold Mine is located in the Walker Lane Trend in East San Bernardino County, California and produced approximately 344,000 ounces of gold (see ASX release 15 March 2021). Significant potential remains for extension to mineralization at depth. Competent Person Statement Sample preparation and any exploration information in this announcement is based upon work reviewed by Mr Greg Hall who is a Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CP - IMM). Mr Hall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration an d to the activity which he is undertaking to quality as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (JORC Code). Mr Hall is a Non - Executive Director of D ateline Resources Limited and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 Drill - hole table (for drill holes with greater than 0.2g/t Au) Sample_ID Hole_ID Drill Type From (m) To (m) Length (m) Au ppm Ag ppm 326245 CRG21 - 003 Core 33.4 33.7 0.3 0.21 3.49 326246 CRG21 - 003 Core 33.7 33.9 0.2 2.57 38.30 326247 CRG21 - 003 Core 33.9 34.0 0.2 1.03 8.20 326248 CRG21 - 003 Core 34.0 34.4 0.4 0.89 10.80 E255055 CRG21 - 004 Core 17.2 17.8 0.6 15.20 60.70 E255056 CRG21 - 004 Core 17.8 19.4 1.6 7.73 77.90 E255058 CRG21 - 004 Core 19.4 10.7 - 8.7 0.31 3.86 E255061 CRG21 - 004 Core 21.1 21.5 0.4 0.29 1.95 326229 CRG21 - 006 Core 21.8 22.3 0.5 17.95 49.60 E255081 CRG21 - 007 Core 5.9 6.1 0.2 0.80 5.13 E255084 CRG21 - 007 Core 6.6 7.0 0.5 0.38 17.80 E255087 CRG21 - 007 Core 9.0 9.5 0.6 0.41 5.48 E255088 CRG21 - 007 Core 9.5 10.2 0.7 0.37 4.21 E255089 CRG21 - 007 Core 10.2 10.5 0.3 0.41 3.65 E255097 CRG21 - 013 Core 32.6 32.8 0.2 0.41 7.51 E255099 CRG21 - 014 Core 29.0 30.5 1.5 0.37 2.50 E255100 CRG21 - 014 Core 30.5 32.2 1.7 0.22 9.30 E255105 CRG21 - 014 Core 55.4 55.8 0.4 0.25 3.49 E255114 CRG21 - 016 Core 18.3 18.4 0.1 0.30 1.81 E255115 CRG21 - 016 Core 18.4 18.7 0.3 0.60 4.51 E255130 CRG21 - 014a Core 29.0 29.3 0.2 0.30 2.40 E255132 CRG21 - 014a Core 29.6 30.1 0.5 2.33 14.40 E255133 CRG21 - 014a Core 30.1 30.8 0.7 0.40 13.30 E255144 CRG21 - 017 Core 20.8 21.2 0.4 1.32 6.36 E255145 CRG21 - 017 Core 21.2 21.9 0.7 0.72 14.70 E255148 CRG21 - 017 Core 23.9 24.4 0.5 0.73 2.59 E255176 CRG21 - 025 Core 17.2 17.7 0.6 0.44 9.56 E255177 CRG21 - 025 Core 17.7 19.1 1.4 5.53 9.09 E255179 CRG21 - 025 Core 21.3 21.9 0.6 0.20 8.19 E255182 CRG21 - 025 Core 25.3 26.2 0.9 14.71 23.70 E255183 CRG21 - 025 Core 26.2 26.5 0.4 11.54 35.10 E255209 CRG21 - 026 Core 53.2 53.7 0.5 0.33 0.86 E255215 CRG21 - 026 Core 56.4 57.2 0.8 15.74 106.29 E255219 CRG21 - 026 Core 57.8 58.2 0.4 0.68 3.43 E255226 CRG21 - 027 Core 58.3 58.7 0.4 2.07 4.11 E255232 CRG21 - 027 Core 63.3 64.0 0.7 0.29 25.37 E255234 CRG21 - 027 Core 64.0 64.6 0.6 56.74 383.66 E255236 CRG21 - 027 Core 64.6 64.9 0.3 1.47 35.32 E255237 CRG21 - 027 Core 64.9 65.1 0.3 33.19 228.35 E255239 CRG21 - 027 Core 65.1 65.6 0.5 8.61 39.09 ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 2021 Drill - hole Co - ordinates Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Total Depth (m) CRG21 - 001 2694042 1291581 9845 21 CRG21 - 002 2694042 1291581 9845 27.6 CRG21 - 003 2694042 1291581 9845 37.1 CRG21 - 004 2694042 1291581 9845 45.6 CRG21 - 005 2694042 1291581 9845 57.1 CRG21 - 006 2694042 1291581 9845 58.4 CRG21 - 007 2694042 1291581 9845 28.9 CRG21 - 008 2694042 1291581 9845 32.2 CRG21 - 009 2693929 1291307 9807 37.1 CRG21 - 010 2693929 1291307 9807 18 CRG21 - 013 2693929 1291307 9807 96.5 CRG21 - 014 2693929 1291307 9807 63.6 CRG21 - 014a 2693929 1291307 9807 41.7 CRG21 - 015 2693929 1291307 9807 48.6 CRG21 - 016 2693929 1291307 9807 58.7 CRG21 - 017 2693929 1291307 9807 49.9 CRG21 - 018 2693929 1291307 9807 48.3 CRG21 - 025 2694056 1291599 9845 121 CRG21 - 026 2693699 1291534 9710 70.7 CRG21 - 027 2693699 1291534 9710 72.8 ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more exp lanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • As of 9/30/2021 , the Gold Links Project CRG Mining, LLC has completed 1,238 metres of drilling in 24 drill holes. All the drilling was done underground with diamond drill core. Industry standard core handling and sampling procedures were employed to ensure high quality sam ples. • Core sample boundaries were defined by changes in lithology, alteration, and mineralization noted in logging. • Potentially mineralized intervals were identified by geological logging and dispatched for assay with minimum 0.3 metre shoulder samples. • Lo gging geologist identified zones of interest for sampling and sampled them. They also sampled a length equivalent to approximately 20% of the zone of interest on each side of it. These are referred to as shoulder samples. • Core remaining after sampling was stored in wax coated cardboard core trays. • Samples from drill hole s wer e sent to ALSGlobal and Paragon Geochemical in Reno, Nevada for sample preparation and assay. Samples were dried, weighed, crus hed and split to obtain 250 gm. Samples were placed in rin g and puck grinder to produce 85% minus 75 micron pulp. This material was blended on clean cloth and packaged in paper pulp bags. Using a pulp balance, a 30 gm sample was weighted out for traditional fire assay. Samples were analyzed using standard fire a s say for gold . Overlimits were analyzed via gravimetric analysis. • All samples followed a strict Chain of Custody. • Routine QAQC samples were inserted in the sample runs at a rate of 20 % , comprising Certified Reference Materials from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd., and verified blank granitic material. • Sampling practice is appropri ate to the geology and mineraliz ation of the deposit and complies with industry best practice. Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open - hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face - sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • The drilling program utilizes underground core drilling. • The core drilling is being conducted with a DE - 130 Sandvik rig with HQTT core tooling. Standard tubes were used for the first 6 drillholes, the rest utilized triple tube to increase recoveries. The drilling has been completed by an experience d diamond drilling core driller. Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure • All drilling recoveries have been logged and notated each run based on 1.65 - meter tooling. • To maximize sample recoveries, use of triple tube and long chain polymer muds were used to increase recovery . ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to prefer ential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • There has been no analysis between sample recoveries and grade to date . Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • Core samples were geologically logged. Lithology, veining, alteration, mineralization and weathering are recorded in the appropriate tables of the drill hole database. • Each core box was photographed dry and wet, after logging of unit and structures were notated on the core. • Core was cut along the long axis using a diamond saw, half - core was sampled, and half stored for reference . • Geological logging of core samples is qualitative and quantitative in nature. Sub - sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non - core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub - sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second - half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. • All drill core samples were cut along the long axis. The left side when look ing down hole was sampled. Samples were placed in a heavy - duty poly sample bag. Each core sample placed in heavy duty poly sample bag, noted interval width in sample book, with a sample tag with the corresponding sample number placed in the bag with the ot her tag stapled to the top of the bag. Sample bags were stapled along the top. Samples were sent by freight to ALSGlobal or Paragon Geochemical, Reno, Nevada. • Routine QAQC samples were inserted at a 20% rate into the sample batches and comprised Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd . and verified blank granitic material. • Rock samples sent to ALS Laboratories were dried, weighed, crushed and split, with a split pulverized to better than 85% passing 75 microns. S amples were analyzed for trace elements using 4 - acid digestion . Additionally, rocks samples were analyzed by standard 30gm fire assay for gold and silver. • Sample size assessment was not conducted but used sampling size which is typical for gold deposits. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. • Samples were assayed by industry standard methods by ALSGlobal Laboratories, Paragon Geochemical in Reno, Nevada and Hazen Research Laboratories in Golden, Colorado. • Fire assays for gold and silver were completed using industry standard fire assay methodology. • External certified standards and blank material were adde d to the sample submission. ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • Sampling, documentation and sample submittal were under the guid ance and care of Graham Craig, GIT (Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Manitoba). • Drilling, sample, and assay data is currently stored in MX Deposit, a secured data management system through Seequent. Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down - hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • All drill hole collars are surveyed using differential GPS survey equipment. The positions are accurate to within 10 cm x - y and height (z) to +/ - 20 cm. • The holes are surveyed in the Colorado State Plane, UTM zone 12, NAD 1983 coordinate system. • Down hole surveys will be done using a Reflex SPRINT - IQ north seeking gyro o n all diamond drill holes. With collars surveyed using Reflex TN - 14 Azimuth Aligner. • Sample locations were surveyed using Colorado State Plane, UTM zone 12, NAD 1983 coordinate system . Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sampl e compositing has been applied. • The spacing and location of data is currently 16 - 33 meter spacing according to previous Mineral Resource estimation completed. • No sample compositing has been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • Drill holes are planned to be drilled obliquely to near perpendicular to the known mineralized structures. Definition of structure location is t he principal goal. • Sample orientation is deemed to be representative for reporting purposes. • No bias is considered to have been introduced by the existing sampling orientation. Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • All samples were taken and maintained under the constant care of CRG Mining personnel. Samples were delivered to laboratories by a licensed transportation company. Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • Drill hole sampling techniques and QAQC procedures have been developed and reviewed by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P. Geo. of Acuity Geoscience Ltd. , Graham Craig, GIT. • The QAQC program has demonstrated its ability to catch errors. • A QAQC review will be completed for this program. ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. • All tenements are 100% owned by Dateline Resources Limited or a wholly owned subsidiary and there exist production - based royalties as previously disclosed to ASX. Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. • Historical work was completed by various groups over 100 years. Review of this work was completed by Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. In 2019. • All previous work undertaken by others is non - JORC compliant. Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineraliation. • The Gold Links Project is hosted by an Early Proterozoic assemblage of fine - grained meta - sediments and interbedded felsitic meta - volcanics. These were intruded by Early Proterozoic amphibolites, granites, and rhyolite porphyry dykes. Tertiary age rhyolitic stocks, dikes and sills intrude the Proterozoic rocks. • The gold and silver mineralization occurs in narrow fissure quartz veins. Veins in the district trend West - Northwest with steep Southerly dips. • T he auriferous quartz veins cut through the various rock types. There appears to be an affinity for the veins with the amphibolites. The primary sulphide occurring in these veins is pyrite. Broad zones of silicification and disseminated sulfides have been found near the veins. Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. • See Table 1 with in this report for details of the drill holes and sample locations . Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of • Drill hole intersections are reported above a lower exploration cut - off grade of 0. 2 g/T Au and no upper cut off grade has been applie d. ASX Release 2 5 November 2021 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary high grades) and cut - off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregatio ns should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). • Drill holes are orientated obliquely to the mineralized structures and disseminated bodies. • Interception angles of the mineralized structures are estimated by geometries from known occurrences in the adjacent mine workings and the core dril ling intercepts. Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. • Supporting figures have been included within the body of this release. Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. • Representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths have been reported. Other substantive exploration data • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminati ng substances. Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large - scale step - out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. • At Gold Links , future work will include expanded drilling the on - strike and down - dip ext ensions of the 2150, Hanging Wall, and 1700 veins , preparation for underground exploitation, finalizing the surface program ; reopening, mapping and sampling of previously inaccessible underground workings; as well as infill and expanded surface soil geochemistry, geological mapping, and geophysics.
Information on this Website is provided for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. ASX Information (including company announcements and prices) is delayed by at least 20 minutes. JSE Information (including company announcements and prices) is delayed by at least 15 minutes. Reliance on the information you access on or from this Website is solely at your own risk. We make no representation or warranty in relation to the future performance of the companies that appear on this Website. Investment in securities involves risk and you should obtain independent professional legal, financial, investment or company advice before acting on any of the information you access on this Website. Using, browsing or otherwise accessing this Website is subject to our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.

© 2021 Listcorp. ABN 60 166 140 307

Never miss news from Dateline Resources Limited (ASX:DTR) when you join Listcorp.